tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7268813616456268351.post8131171801360074238..comments2023-12-26T21:16:40.265-05:00Comments on the hunting of the snark: Fit 7, pg. 73/3 … the square root of negative one is snark!Mahendra Singhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15308770582240496910noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7268813616456268351.post-90925184770473077122011-11-27T13:32:59.612-05:002011-11-27T13:32:59.612-05:00Yes, Goetz, it is a shorter definition than Carrol...Yes, Goetz, it is a shorter definition than Carroll's, but not as much fun to draw.Mahendra Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15308770582240496910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7268813616456268351.post-4222456984844516992011-11-27T13:03:16.387-05:002011-11-27T13:03:16.387-05:00"The square root of negative one is snark!&qu..."The square root of negative one is snark!". That surely is an very appropriate description of the imaginary beast. It lives in our <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bonnetmaker/4568438225/" rel="nofollow">dreams</a>.Götzhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/bonnetmaker/noreply@blogger.com